« A man owns himself | Main | Universal Cell phone Charger »
June 29, 2009
I don't think this qualifies as a coup
Coup d'état, a sudden and decisive action in politics, esp. one resulting in a change of government illegally or by force.
According to the WSJ:
That Mr. Zelaya (Honduran President) acted as if he were above the law, there is no doubt. While Honduran law allows for a constitutional rewrite, the power to open that door does not lie with the president. A constituent assembly can only be called through a national referendum approved by its Congress.But Mr. Zelaya declared the vote on his own and had Mr. Chávez ship him the necessary ballots from Venezuela. The Supreme Court ruled his referendum unconstitutional, and it instructed the military not to carry out the logistics of the vote as it normally would do.
The top military commander, Gen. Romeo Vásquez Velásquez, told the president that he would have to comply. Mr. Zelaya promptly fired him. The Supreme Court ordered him reinstated. Mr. Zelaya refused.
Calculating that some critical mass of Hondurans would take his side, the president decided he would run the referendum himself. So on Thursday he led a mob that broke into the military installation where the ballots from Venezuela were being stored and then had his supporters distribute them in defiance of the Supreme Court's order.
The attorney general had already made clear that the referendum was illegal, and he further announced that he would prosecute anyone involved in carrying it out. Yesterday, Mr. Zelaya was arrested by the military and is now in exile in Costa Rica.
Honduras Defends Its Democracy Fidel Castro and Hillary Clinton object.
The NY Times essentially agrees with these facts, and yet gives the headline Honduran President Is Ousted in Coup. If the congress impeaches the president and he won't go and so they have to call in the military, would they call that a coup? I doubt it. But when the supreme court does the same thing the NY Times seems to think that is a coup.
Reminds me of the famous quote of Andrew Jackson about the Supreme Court's holding that the state of Georgia could not impose its state laws upon Cherokee tribal lands, "John Marshall has made his decision; let him enforce it now if he can." Was that a coup too?
Mr. Zelaya is surely naive if he believes this:
“They are creating a monster they will not be able to contain,” he told a local television station in San José. “A usurper government, that emerges by force, cannot be accepted, will not be accepted by any country.”
There are quite a few governments, including our own that are usurpers emerging by force.
PS
I think David Bernstein at Volokh agrees.
Posted by OneEyedMan at June 29, 2009 7:46 AM
Comments
While I follow your logic, it seems that it's not just the NYTimes who hopped on the 'coup' train: the WSJ has a front page headline about a coup this morning as well...
Posted by: Jess H
at June 29, 2009 10:47 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)